EU judgments
-
T-528/22 Belaruskali AAT v Council
-
T-521/22 Golovaty v Council
-
T-534/22 Belarusian Potash Company AAT v Council
-
T‑116/22 Belavia – Belarusian Airlines AAT v Council
-
T‑117/22 Grodno Azot AAT v Council
-
T-245/21 Varabei v Council
-
T-563/21 and T-564/2 Zaytsev & Bremino-Grupp TAA v Council
-
T-532/21 OAO Minskii Avtomobilnyi Zavod – upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belavtomaz v Council
-
T-533/21 OAO Belaz – upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belaz Holding v Council
-
T-97/21 and T-215/22 Synesis v Council
-
T-523/21 and T-216/22 Shatrov v Council
-
T-526/21 Gutseriev v Council
-
T-239/21 Dana Astra
-
T-141/21 Shakutin
-
T-583/21 Bakhanovich
-
T-582/21 Rubnikovich
-
T-581/21 Skryba
-
T-580/21 Haidukevich
-
T-579/21 Gusachenka
-
T-557/21 Omeliyanyuk
-
T-556/21 Lyubetskaya
-
T-536/21 Belaeronavigatsia
-
T-765/15 BelTechExport ZAO
-
T-693/15 Mikhalchanka
-
T-275/12 FC Dynamo-Minsk
-
T-276/12 Chyzh & Others
-
C-535/14 P Ipatau
-
T-163/12 Ternavsky
-
T-438/11 BelTechExport
-
T-439/11 Sport-pari
-
T-440/11 BT Telecommunications
-
T-441/11 Peftiev
-
T-196/11 Mikhalchanka
-
T-646/11 Ipatau
-
C-314/13 Peftiev
-
T-163/12 R Ternavsky
UK judgments
-
LLC Synesis v Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs [2023] EWHC 541 (Admin)
US judgments
-
Okko Business PE v. Lew Civil Action No. 1:14–cv–925 CKK
